Darwin and Gambles Debate Essay -- Nathaniel Hawthorne The Birthmark

Darwin and jeopardizes Debate Nathaniel Hawthornes The nevus gives a human face to Darwin and Gambles donnish debate concerning natural selection. In the story, Georgiana has a birthmark on her grimace that has been visible her entire carriage, but was just starting to agitate her husband, Aylmer. He used science to successfully rid his wife of the birthmark, but the military operation was fatal. The process that the couple went through appears to be a response to the surmise of natural selection, with her death as the ultimate conclusion. This essay will rise the speculation, the story, and the link between them.While Darwin and Gambles theses contain duple line of reasonings and have multiple conclusions, the most important of them is the notion of natural selection. In Descent of Man, Darwin summarizes his argument by saying, through the contest of rival malesand from the general struggle for lifethe characters gained will have been transmitted to the offspring. (Darw in 6). It is contended that change among a given species is spontaneous (and normal), and sometimes the change is good (insofar as it adds a positive trace or traits to the organism), and sometimes it is bad. Those organisms with good changes will be fit to cope with food and protect offspring, and those that are less fit will be less apt to do this. Extending the logic of this statement, the fit will survive, and the decrepit will die. The argument of whether or not one gender has commence superior to another within the same species is irrelevant to Natural Selection. However, Darwin and Gamble bring this dispute to each of their respective works. Since they agree on the original concept of the survival of the fittest, their disagreements are reconcilable. Darwin crea... ...t is my contention that the application of the theory of natural selection to society and humanity is relatively unimportant, when compared with the application of the theory to evolution. Hawthornes The Birthmark was a very timely interpretation of the events surrounding the emergence of the theory of natural selection. It shows the reader that the academic debate between Darwin and Gamble has a human face, and that all of us can learn from Aylmers mistake, and Aminadabs nobility. Works Cited1. Darwin, Charles. intimate Selection in Relation to Man. The Descent of Man. New York Prometheus Books, 1998. 576-586.2. Gamble, Eliza Burt. The Supremacy of the Male. The Sexes in Science and History. New York G.P. Putnam Sons, 1916. 74-92.3. Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Birthmark. Anthology of American Literature. New York McMillan, 1985. 1159-1169.