'Juvenile Crime Statistics Paper Essay\r'

'The Federal Bureau of Investigation tracks four offenses murder, rich rape, robbery, and aggravated assault in its rough crime mogul. The new-fashioned arrest set for each of these offenses has been declining steady since the mid-1990s. The murder charge per unit fell 70% from its 1993 note through 2001 (Snyder, 2003).\r\nStatistics: Research has shown that crimes committed by recents argon more likely to be absolved by police enforcement than crimes committed by adults. The clearance info in the Crime in the United States serial publication show that the harmonise of violent crimes attri excepted to insipid persons by law enforcement has diminutiond in recent years. The harmonize of violent crimes cle ard by recent arrests grew from about 9% in the previous(a) mid-eighties to 14% in 1994 and because declined to 12% in 2001. (Snyder 2003).\r\nCleared Proportions: The adolescent counterbalance of cleared forcible rapes peaked in 1995 and thus fell, with the 2 001 proportion still above the levels of the late 1980s. The juvenile proportion of robbery clearances in like manner peaked in 1995 at 20% and fell substantially by 2001 to 14%, but was still above the levels of the late 1980s at 10%. The juvenile proportion of aggravated assault clearances was at 12% in 2001 and was slightly below its peak of 13% in 1994. This was still substantially above the levels of the late 1980s. The proportion of Property Crime Index offenses cleared by juvenile arrests in 2001 was below all but 2 years in the 1980s and 1990s. (Snyder 2003) do drugs Offenses: The text highlights an overall increase in the rate of drug offenses as well as innocent assaults amount juveniles.\r\nAfter review of arrest statistics, the determination were that law enforcement agencies made an estimated 202,500 arrests of young people for drug holler violations in 2001. Of those 202,500 arrests a drug abuse violation is seen to be the most serious. There was a decline in juve nile arrests for murder amongst 1992 and 2001. During this time period there were a banging be of increases as well though. Statistics showed 51% push back vehicle theft and 40 % burglary. There was also a major increase in juvenile arrests for drug abuse violations at a 121%. (Snyder 2003). childlike assault increased amid the early 1980s and the late 1990s which was more than 150% between 1983 and 1997. This rate fell 7% between 1997 and 2001.\r\nArrests of Females: Arrests of females for several(a) offenses are increasing more than the arrests of males, and the overall juvenile arrest rate for simple assault in 2001 remained near its all-time high. (Snyder 2003). Of the juvenile arrests inform in 2001 females accounted for 23% of those arrests for aggravated assault and 32% of juvenile arrests for other(a) assaults. Females also appeared to be the leading agitate in regards to runaway violations. Females were involved in 59% of all arrests for running away from home. Arr ests for curfew and loitering law violations were reported at 31% for female juveniles. Females accounted for 23% of juvenile arrests for aggravated assault and 32% of juvenile arrests for other assaults (i.e., simple assaults and intimidations) in 2001. Females were involved in 59% of all arrests for running away from home and 31% of arrests for curfew and loitering law violations. (Snyder 2003) Violent Arrests of the Races: The text points out that the contrariety in violent crime arrest judge for colored juveniles and white juveniles declined substantially between 1980 and 2001.\r\nIn 2001 the juvenile population was comprised of 78% white, 17% black, 4% Asiatic/Pacific Islander, and 1% American Indian. Violent crime statistics showed that 55% involved white youth, 43% involved black youth, 1% involved Asian youth, and 1% involved American Indian youth. The results for piazza crime arrests were 68% white youth, 28% black youth, 2% Asian youth, and 1% American Indian youth. B etween 1980 through 2001 black-to-white disparity in juvenile arrest rates for violent crimes show a decrease. The black juvenile Violent Crime Index arrest rate was 6.3 times the white rate in 1980 and in 2001; the rate disparity had declined to 3.6. The simplification in arrest rate were primarily imputable to the decline in black-to-white arrest disparities for robbery, which was greater than the decline for aggravated assault.\r\nConclusion\r\nThe outlook for the juvenile crime rate is uncertain as there are many factors which will affect those final numbers. genius thing is for certain and that is that the population is projected to train throughout the county at a rapid pace. The number of juveniles age 11 through 17; the ages of juveniles responsible for 99% of juvenile arrests will increase in the next decade. This will ultimately cause a spike in juvenile offenses and arrest numbers.\r\nReferences:\r\nSnyder, H. (December 2003). U.S. part of jurist. Office of Justice P rograms. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Juvenile Arrests 2001. Retrieved July 24, 2008, from http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/ojjdp/201370.pdf\r\n'